Every submission assessed by AI PreCheck moves through the same workflow, regardless of how the platform is deployed. The workflow transforms drawings, documents, and project information into structured findings that can be reviewed by applicants, municipal staff, or both, depending on the selected integration model.
The assessment workflow
Section titled “The assessment workflow”1. Submission intake
Section titled “1. Submission intake”A submission is created and project information, drawings, and supporting documents are provided to PreCheck. Depending on the deployment model, this may happen through a municipal permit system, a permit software platform, or directly through Archistar.
2. AI interpretation and extraction
Section titled “2. AI interpretation and extraction”PreCheck interprets the submitted drawings and documents, extracting the information needed to assess compliance and submission readiness. This includes identifying relevant project attributes, dimensions, annotations, and supporting information.
3. Rule selection
Section titled “3. Rule selection”Based on the project information and municipality configuration, PreCheck determines which zoning, building code, and readiness rules should be applied to the submission.
4. Compliance assessment
Section titled “4. Compliance assessment”PreCheck evaluates the submission against the applicable rules and generates findings. Each finding is linked to the rule, evidence, and supporting context used in the assessment.
5. Report generation
Section titled “5. Report generation”The assessment results are assembled into a structured report that allows findings to be reviewed, validated, and acted upon. Findings are grouped by category and supported by evidence and visual context where applicable.
6. Review and correction
Section titled “6. Review and correction”Depending on the deployment model, findings may be reviewed by applicants before formal submission, by municipal staff during permit review, or by both. Findings can be validated, annotated, addressed, or escalated as required.
7. Decision and submission progression
Section titled “7. Decision and submission progression”Once findings have been reviewed and any required corrections have been made, the submission proceeds through the municipality’s normal permit review process. PreCheck supports the review process but does not make permitting decisions.
Continuous improvement
Section titled “Continuous improvement”AI PreCheck improves over time through reviewer feedback, applicant behaviour, operational analytics, and ongoing rule and model refinement. This helps ensure assessments remain aligned with municipal requirements and real-world permitting practices.
What happens next?
Section titled “What happens next?”The workflow described above is common across all deployment models. The way users interact with the workflow depends on how PreCheck is integrated into a municipality’s permitting ecosystem.
- Learn about the available deployment models in the Integration Guide
- Explore applicant and reviewer workflows in AI PreCheck 2.0